Comments on the Water Services (Amendment) Bill 2011 – Septic Tanks

Last week the Irish Government published the draft legislation to address the issue of septic tanks and other on-site wastewater treatment systems. This amendment to the Water Services Act 2007 has been introduced to make Ireland compliant with a European … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Your Water Bill for 2012 is ……

Last week an Irish Minister of State announced that water meters may not all be installed before water charges are introduced and that it may be overly costly to install meters in some instances. I think that it is highly probable, and probable the most sensible approach, that water charges will be introduced in Ireland in advance of water meters; and possibly sooner rather than later.

In truth, and nobody will know this better than the IMF, you don’t need water meters to raise a bill. You just need a person to bill and a formula to calculate the amount. There is no reason why a bill could not be issued to each property on the 1st of January 2012 (or earlier).

A couple of weeks ago, at a conference in Dublin, I suggested how a standard water charge letter might be constructed in Ireland. These are the opening paragraphs:

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IMF – Ireland’s Metering Fantasy?

I spoke last week at an excellent conference in Dublin organized by CMG Events. In the course of my presentation I tried to put a spotlight on the status of water charges in Ireland in the context of the IMF programme for Ireland.

My basic premise is that the IMF will not allow Ireland to wait four or five years on a promise to install water meters before we get around to charging directly for water. We will be required to come up with a technical and political way of introducing water charges in 2012 or 2013. Water meters will not be installed nationally before 2015, and the IMF is fully aware that many countries manage to have water charges without water meters. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Septic Tank “NCT” – A Proposal for Regulation, Inspection & Certification in Ireland

The following blog is an extension of an answer that I gave to a question at the Engineers Ireland Conference in Cork on 23 April 2010.

Problem: The European Court of Justice has ruled against Ireland for failing to have a proper system of licensing and regulating individual septic tanks. There are at least 418,000 septic tanks (CSO, 2006) in Ireland and records are patchy. There is evidence that many septic tanks are poorly constructed and/or maintained and are point-source polluters of watercourses and groundwater.

Background: The septic tank is a simple primary treatment process for domestic wastewater, and the normal form of treatment used in one-off rural dwellings. The septic tank is normally a 2-chamber tank with a percolation area for secondary treatment. If properly constructed in an appropriate environment, correctly used and regularly maintained, then the septic tank is a perfectly adequate means of treating wastewater.

However, it is evident that many septic tanks and percolation areas have been constructed in areas that are not suited to this technology. Furthermore, the construction of bespoke septic tanks is questionable; and finally, the maintenance regime is often ignored.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Are Water Charges & Water Metering the Answer to Ireland’s Water Infrastructure Challenges?

(Presented to the Annual Conference of Engineers Ireland in Cork – 23 April 2010)

Mr Chairman, Ladies & Gentlemen.

Good Morning.

May I first thank the Local Government Division for their invitation to address the Annual Conference. It is a great honour for any member of Engineers Ireland to be given the opportunity to address our Annual Conference.

As the subject of my paper is water charges and metering, I feel that I must also thank the Minister for the Environment and his Department for choosing this week to bring the issue back into the spotlight.

This morning I have been asked to address the question posed on this slide:

“Are Water Charges & Water Metering the Solution to Ireland’s Water Infrastructure Challenges?”

The answer is Yes.

However, I have to talk for 30 minutes so we had better expand a bit on that. 

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

No free flow, come hell or high water

(Article published in the Irish Examiner 22 April 2010)

Last month the OECD reported that climate change and the over-use of water will mean that nearly one in every two people will live in water-stressed areas of the world by 2030.

Water stress is simply a term to describe what happens when people in an area start to use a critical amount of the available water resource. As the demand on the limited supply increases it puts a strain on the ecosystem and pressure on water quality and reliability of supply. Water will be an increasing source of international tension.

The OECD made the comment about water stress when it was launching a new report called “Pricing Water Resources and Water and Sanitation”. The OECD noted that households and industries in many OECD countries increasingly pay the true cost of the water they consume through user prices that reflect the actual treatment costs. Rather pointedly they note that “Irish households pay no direct fees for water”.

These studies say that putting the right price on water will encourage people to waste less, pollute less and invest in more water infrastructure. I wonder was the author in Ireland over the last few months?

While the Irish Government has clearly said that domestic water charges and water metering are on their way, there remains a lot of uncertainty about how this will happen. Indeed, it has been suggested by the Minister for the Environment that each consumer will get a free allocation of water when water charges are introduced. While this is a nice idea, I don’t think it is either technically feasible or morally justifiable. This is the myth of free water.

Firstly, there is no such thing as free water. Somebody is paying for the drinking water. In the Irish case, it is the tax payer. If an allocation of free water is provided to every domestic consumer then the tax payer is subsidizing the service.

Secondly, an allocation of free water (irrespective of means) is a subsidy for the wealthy. Why should the tax payer give a free allocation of water to those that can afford to pay for water; and would pay for water in most other countries in Europe? Why should the PAYE tax-payer subsidize the private swimming pool and ornamental gardens in the Blackrocks of this country?

If we look to other vital services such as gas and electricity we see no similar universal free allocation. This does not mean that those who are vulnerable are ignored. They are protected through the social welfare system. Why must we consider treating water any differently?

If a free allocation of water is considered then we must decide how much free drinking water should be granted to each property. Consumption is linked to occupancy levels not the size of the property, so how do you go about counting how many people are in the house or apartment at any time? However it is done it will not be done cheaply; and the cost of administering the “free allocation” will have to be shared out among the customers. An allocation of “free water” will only make drinking water more expensive than it needs to be.   

There is a risk that a free allocation will be over-estimated, giving an effective additional subsidy to one or two person occupancy properties. Those customers will have no incentive to use water responsibly. One should also consider the impact on those non-domestic customers that share a connection with a domestic customer, for example the shop with an apartment overhead. If an overly generous free allocation is available to the domestic element of the supply, then this becomes an effective subsidy on the non-domestic customer. This is not available to the non-domestic customer whose water service is separated from domestic customers. A “free water” allocation is likely to be unfair.

If there is a free allocation of water for domestic customers then further consideration will have to be given to a free allocation of water to public and private residential institutions, such as nursing homes, hospitals and boarding schools. How will we treat hotels, halls of residence and bed & breakfasts?

Perhaps more fundamentally, the eccentricities of the Irish plumbing systems do not always lend themselves easily to the identification of individual customers, especially in urban areas. Supply pipes can be found to take anything but direct routes from A to B, and connections can be found in the most unexpected places. Accordingly, three or four customers may have to be metered as one connection for technical and cost reasons. How can they be asked to share a free allocation of water? Who would take the greater share?

In the circumstances, the more reasonable course of action is to follow the approach taken in other utilities and not to offer a free universal allocation of water, but to deal with vulnerable consumers through the social welfare system. The free water myth sounds nice, but it is a cheap gimmick that presumes on our greed and will cost us more in the long-term. Have we not been here before?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

As Temperatures Fall, Taps Dry Up. (Sunday Business Post – 17th Jan 2010)

Our water services have been at breaking point for the last week, as local authority engineers battle to maintain water supplies in the middle of the most severe freezing weather that most of us can remember.

So why has this happened? Why have so many people across the country been left without water, or with very low water pressure?

The simple answer is that we have had a lengthy period of extremely cold weather, of the kind which has not been experienced in Ireland for many years. This has frozen the water in the public mains and in private household plumbing.

As water freezes, it expands, and this puts pressure on pipes and joints, which can open up cracks and holes in the system. As temperatures rise again and the ice melts, leaks emerge, with the worst often only becoming evident after the ice and snow has gone.

Is it all down to Mother Nature? Well, Father Time may have caught up with us as well. We have old Victorian cast iron pipes in some of our town centres, and many older houses still have old, paper-thin lead pipes connecting domestic plumbing to the public supply.

Older pipes, and those poorly installed in modern times, are more susceptible, but they would have been susceptible in a normal cold winter as well – and local authorities would have expected an increase in bursts in a normal winter and would have planned accordingly. So this latest crisis does seem to have been caused by the weather.

At the moment, many of those responsible for our water services are battling to maintain water supplies and fix leaks, and are also coping with the general public who are leaving taps running. We appreciate that they are doing this out of genuine concern for the potential damage to their own property.

However, their actions can leave vulnerable neighbours without water. In the nightmare scenario, there would not be enough water in the mains for fire-fighting. A tap running overnight conservatively adds at least 25 per cent to the typical daily consumption of a household.

In this time of national water stress, it is very important that everybody conserve water where possible, take steps to identify and fix leaks in their own properties and report any leaks in the public network to the local authorities.

Just because you find that you have a supply of water next week does not mean that you don’t have a leak. Many leaks are dribbling water into the ground under the walls of houses for months and years, and don’t get fixed until the wall above starts to subside and crack. Without doubt, many of these ‘‘silent killer’’ leaks will have opened in the last week.

We are fortunate that we are not starting from square one. Since the mid-1990s, and particularly since the National Water Study in 2000, local authorities and the Department of the Environment have spent many millions of euro on water conservation and water mains rehabilitation. Perish the thought, but the situation could have been worse if that investment had not been made.

A new water services investment programme is being prepared by the Department of the Environment, Heritage & Local Government based on the assessment of needs prepared by each local authority late last year, prioritising water conservation and leakage control. This is to be applauded, and it is hoped that the government will continue to fund water services, as they have for several years.

Whatever way local authorities have coped with this weather, it is certain that there will be a review to see how the system can respond better the next time.

So this may be a good opportunity to review the National Water Study of 2000, to reprioritise water management in Ireland in the context of these events and climate change in general.

The proposed introduction of domestic water charges in 2011 gives an opportunity to install water meters on each property. These would help to identify leaks and wastage in private property more quickly and save the cost of building more water treatment and storage facilities.

This may also be an opportunity to extend the Home Energy Saving Scheme to include water efficiency measures, such as rainwater harvesting, and plumbing improvements to make private houses more frost-resilient.

Finally, there may be a bright future for Ireland in the area of water as a resource.

While most of the world is expecting water shortages due to climate change in future decades, Ireland is expected to have a good supply of raw water which will become vital to attract inward investment. It is up to us to manage that raw water, treat it well and respect its use.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Problem with Free Water

It has recently been reported that domestic water charges are to be introduced in Ireland and this is to be welcomed. However, it has been suggested that each consumer will be granted an allocation of free water before the charges are levied. I have grave concerns about the concept of free water.

Firstly, there is no such thing as free water. Somebody is paying for the water. In the Irish case, it is the tax payer. If an allocation of free water is provided to every domestic consumer then the tax payer is subsidising the service.

Secondly, an allocation of free water (irrespective of means) is a subsidy for the wealthy. Why should the tax payer give a free allocation of water to those that can afford to pay for water; and would pay for water in most other countries in Europe.

If we look to other vital services such as gas and electricity we see no similar universal free allocation. This does not mean that those who are vulnerable are ignored. They are protected through the social welfare system. Why must we consider treating water any differently?

If a free allocation of water is considered then we must decide how much free water should be provided to each property. Consumption is linked to occupancy levels not the size of the property. There is a risk that a free allocation will be over-estimated, giving an effective additional subsidy to one or two person occupancy properties. Those customers will have no incentive to use water responsibly.

One should also consider the impact on those non-domestic customers that share a connection with a domestic customer, for example the shop with an apartment overhead. If an overly generous free allocation is available to the domestic element of the supply, then this becomes an effective subsidy on the non-domestic customer. This is not available to the non-domestic customer whose water service is separated from domestic customers.

If there is a free allocation of water for domestic customers then further consideration will have to be given to a free allocation of water to public and private residential institutions, such as nursing homes, hospitals and boarding schools.

In the circumstances, I would argue that the more reasonable course of action is to follow the approach taken in other utilities and not to offer a free universal allocation of water, but to deal with vulnerable consumers through the social welfare system.

December 2009

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Please let me pay for Water.

The following article was published in The Engineers Journal in December 2009.

http://www.engineersireland.ie/media/engineersireland/services/engineersjournal/2009/nov-dec2009issue9/Water.pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments